There is also a consensus between pronouns and precursors. Examples of this can be found in English (although English pronouns mainly follow natural sex and not grammatical sex): “In English, concordance is relatively limited. It occurs between the subject of a clause and a current of tension, so that. B, in the case of a singular subject of a third person (for example. B John), the verb of the suffix-suffix must stop. That is, the verb corresponds to its subject by having the corresponding extension. Thus, John drinks a lot of grammar, but drinking a lot to John is not grammatically as a sentence for himself, because the verb does not agree. In the case of verbs, a gender agreement is less widespread, although it may still occur. In the French past, for example, the former work of the participants corresponds, in certain circumstances, to the subject or an object (for more details, see compound past). In Russian and most other Slavic languages, the form of the past in sex corresponds to the subject. At the beginning of modern times, there was an agreement for the second person, which singularus all the verbs in the current form, as well as in the past some usual verbs. It was usually in the shape-east, but -st and t also occurred.
Note that this does not affect endings for other people and numbers. The chord or concord (in abbreviated agr) occurs when a word changes shape according to the other words to which it refers.  This is a case of bending and usually involves making the value of a grammatical category (such as sex or person) “agree” between different words or parts of the sentence. Such a concordance is also found with predictors: man is tall (“man is great”) vs. the chair is large (“the chair is large”). (In some languages, such as German. B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) If you want to use a single word and replace it with a pronoun, make sure that the two words match both in number and gender. Also keep in mind the agreement that has been shown to be also in the subjunctive mind. In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative).
There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object.